Legal Opinion

Naumann v. Windsor Gypsum, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 23, 1988No. 04-87-00018-CVPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CADENA, Chief Justice.

Laura and Ronald Naumann, plaintiffs below, appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Windsor Gypsum, Inc. (Windsor) and argue that there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether defendant breached its duty of care to Nau-mann.

On the night of October 18, 1985, a vehicle driven by Laura Naumann collided with an eighteen-wheeled tractor-trailer driven by Silas Marsh, an employee of Builder’s Transport, Inc. The tractor-trailer had just been loaded with sheetrock at Windsor’s plant near McQueeny, Texas. Marsh left the Windsor plant and turned right…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Redinger v. Living, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Abalos v. Oil Development Co. of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Lawson v. B Four Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  2. Newell v. Montana West, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  3. Carter v. Steere Tank Lines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  4. City of McAllen v. De La GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Yap v. ANR Freight Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API