In Re RAYMOND ESTATE
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this case, we are called upon to discern the group of individuals who may take under the residuary clause of the testator’s will. Petitioner maintains that the residuary clause includes only the surviving siblings of the testator and her late husband, to the exclusion of the surviving heirs of predeceased siblings. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals and hold that the probate court correctly construed the will in petitioner’s favor. The class, “brothers and sisters,” was *50unambiguously qualified and limited by the phrase “that survive…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Butterfield EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Hay v. HayMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re Jamieson EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re Wojan EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Stillwell TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Bill & Dena Brown Trust v. GarciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re Estate of StanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Roselyn Ford v. Department of Health and Human ServicesMichigan Supreme Court · 2019
- Hayes Elbert Baker III, Applicant-Appellant v. State of IowaCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.