Legal Opinion

Newsome v. Union 76 Truck Stop

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 13, 1991No. CA 90-257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Chief Judge.

Charles Newsome appeals from an order of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission holding that his claim was barred by the so-called Shippers Transport doctrine. He contends that the evidence in this case does not support application of that doctrine. We find no error and affirm the order of the Commission.

In Shippers Transport of Georgia v. Stepp, 265 Ark. 365, 578 S.W.2d 232 (1979), the supreme court recognized that public policy places an obligation on an employee to give truthful answers to a prospective employer’s questions about his pre-employment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shippers Transport of Georgia v. SteppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. MacK v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Knight v. Industrial Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Baldwin v. Club Products Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  5. Shock v. Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. James River Corp. v. WaltersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Lamay v. Roswell Independent School DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Lamay v. Roswell Independent School DistrictNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API