Legal Opinion

MacK v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 21, 1989No. CA 89-20PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

The appellant, Leslie Joe Mack, suffered a back injury on October 11, 1986, while working for appellee, Tyson Foods, Inc. Although appellee initially accepted the claim as compensable, appellee later contended that it was barred by the Shippers defense. The administrative law judge agreed and found that the claim was barred. On appeal, the Commission affirmed. Appellant raises two points on appeal which essentially challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the Commission’s decision. We affirm.

The Shippers defense was established by the supreme court in Shippers…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shippers Transport of Georgia v. SteppSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. DisheroonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Osage Oil Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  4. DeFrancisco v. Arkansas Kraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Tahutini v. Tastybird FoodsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Pace IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Public Employee Claims Division v. TinerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  3. CDI CONTRACTORS v. McHaleCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. ITT/Higbie Manufacturing v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Southern Steel & Wire v. KahlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API