Legal Opinion

Buckeye Cotton Oil Co. v. Ragland

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1926No. 4536PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

In September, 1923, Mary Ragland filed her bill of complaint against the Buckeye Cotton Oil Company, in wbieb she averred that she was the owner of a lot, upon which she had resided for 13 years, in Jackson, Miss., on the south side of Monument street; that on the north side of the street, immediately opposite her home, and about 40 feet away, defendant company had and operated a cotton oil mill and delinting plant in such manner as to cause dirt, dust, lint, and cotton fiber to be thrown and to fall on her lot and into her house, to her damage and to the injury of her…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. City of Houston v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Outlaw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  2. Clarke v. BoysenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  3. ALFRED JACKSON REDUCTION CO. v. DockeryMississippi Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Liberty Mut. Ins. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  5. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Standard Asphalt & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API