City of Houston v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clarke
These are cross appeals in a suit to restrain the enforcement of an ordinance enacted by the City of Houston, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the City), prescribing rates for telephone service, based upon the claim that the rates are confiscatory.
The master to whom the case was referred found that the rates were clearly confiscatory and the District Court, while modifying his findings in some respects, confirmed his report and in its decree enjoined the enforcement of the ordinance. A federal constitutional question ’'bé'ing involved a direct appeal brings the case to this court for review.
T…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Galveston Electric Co. v. City of GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- City and County of Denver v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Southern Iowa Electric Co. v. City of CharitonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- West v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bell Tel. Co. of Pa. v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.