Legal Opinion
Columbia Basin Orchard v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided July 12, 1955No. 48674PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
On March 6, 1950, we dismissed plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that their right of action was barred by the statute of limitations. 88 F.Supp. 738, 116 Ct. Cl. 348. Thereafter, Congress passed an Act on May 21, 1954, 68 Stat. Part 2 p. A53, 1 conferring jurisdiction on us to hear plaintiffs’ claim “notwithstanding the lapse of time * * and the case is now before us on the merits.
In our prior consideration of the ease we made only such findings of fact as were necessary for a decision on the, question of the statute of limitations. The findings of fact hereinafter set forth…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Gibson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sanguinetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bedford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Jackson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Moden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Ridge Line, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- State ex rel. Doner v. ZodyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- William Eugene Owen, as of the Estate of Caroline Pearson Payne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.