Legal Opinion

Cox v. Wooten Bros. Farms, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 21, 1981No. CA 80-348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

The appellant, Cox, appeals an adverse chancery court decision and argues one issue for reversal. The sole issue to be decided is whether the trial court erred in applying the equitable doctrine of subrogation so as to entitle the appellee, Wooten, to the rights of the Federal Land Bank of St. Louis on its note and mortgage executed by Cox and other named heirs who acquired an interest in certain property under a family settlement agreement. Whether or not the trial court correctly applied the doctrine directly depends upon the facts before the court and the facts are not in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Napoleon Hill Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  2. Baker v. LeighSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Moon Realty Co. v. Arkansas Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bank of America, NA v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bank of America v. Prestance Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Smith v. WhitenerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Beshear v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Dolphin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API