Legal Opinion
State v. Friedrich
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1989No. C7-88-1972PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant State of Minnesota prosecuted respondents for driving under the influence. (“DWI”) The state used prior guilty pleas by respondents to Wisconsin DWI charges to enhance the Minnesota DWI offense and charged respondents with a gross misdemeanor. The trial court refused to permit enhancement of the charge but certified the question to this court as important and doubtful. The state appeals from the court’s order prohibiting enhancement.
FACTS
Respondent John Friedrich was arrested for DWI in Hastings, Minnesota, August 19,1987. Friedrich consented to an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. BorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. NovakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. HostCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. BerghCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. McLellanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.