State v. Bergh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s refusal to prohibit the use of a prior Colorado driving while intoxicated (DWI)-related driver’s license revocation to enhance Minnesota impaired driving offenses. Because the prior revocation arises from a violation of appellant’s Minnesota constitutional rights, the prior revocation cannot be used to enhance Minnesota offenses, and we reverse.
FACTS
The Minnesota Impaired Driving Code presents a scheme of penalties and enhanced penalties for driving, operating, or being in physical control of a motor vehicle while…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. LoeffelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SchusterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006