Legal Opinion

State v. Bergh

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 2004No. A03-1577PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GORDON W. SHUMAKER, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s refusal to prohibit the use of a prior Colorado driving while intoxicated (DWI)-related driver’s license revocation to enhance Minnesota impaired driving offenses. Because the prior revocation arises from a violation of appellant’s Minnesota constitutional rights, the prior revocation cannot be used to enhance Minnesota offenses, and we reverse.

FACTS

The Minnesota Impaired Driving Code presents a scheme of penalties and enhanced penalties for driving, operating, or being in physical control of a motor vehicle while…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Friedman v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  3. State v. OthoudtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Zahtila v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Rev.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. LoeffelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. SchusterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API