Legal Opinion
Evans v. Eno
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1995No. WD 50144PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRECKENRIDGE, Judge.
John and Marilyn Evans filed suit against Earl and Shirley Eno to recover the deficiency on a promissory note after a foreclosure sale. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Evanses for the amount which the Evanses claimed to be due on the note. The Enos now appeal, contending that there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding the amount of the deficiency.
The judgment is reversed and remanded.
On September 15,1986, the Enos executed a promissory note to the Evanses in the amount of $13,500.00. According to the terms of the note, the Enos were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Bledsoe v. Northside Supply & Development Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Savings Finance Corporation v. BlairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
- MacHholz-parks v. SuddathMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Regional Investment Co. v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- First Bank of Marietta v. Robert L. HoggeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Dean MacHinery Co. v. Union BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- School District of Kansas City v. Missouri Board of Fund CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Brandt v. CsakiMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Nolte v. WittmaierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.