Legal Opinion
Kothrade v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1990No. C4-90-1220PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellants Loren and Jocelyn Kothrade, and minors Kendra, Kelly and Katherine Kothrade by their mother, Jocelyn Ko-thrade, challenge the trial court’s grant of summary judgment for respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company. Appellants contend that to determine the amount of underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 65B.49, subd. 4a (1986), the amount paid to each underinsurance claimant in a settlement agreement with the tort-feasor’s insurance company should be offset against the per person UIM coverage limit with the aggregate of these…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Broton v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Lick v. Dairyland Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Gabriel v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & CasualtyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Valencia Ex Rel. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Royal-Milbank Insurance Co. v. BusseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- LaFave v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993