Legal Opinion

Floyd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 3, 2016No. 2D14-2596PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Nathan Christopher Floyd seeks review of his conviction and life sentence for sexual battery with a deadly weapon. We affirm Floyd’s conviction without comment. However, because Floyd has established that his sentence was imposed in violation of his due process rights, we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Floyd was charged with sexual battery with a deadly weapon committed upon one of three local prostitutes he solicited in the fall of 2011. At the time Floyd’s attorneys were preparing for trial, Floyd had already been convicted of sexual battery with a deadly weapon upon a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. State v. WarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Vardaman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Vondervor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. DEVON F. EVANS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API