Hiller v. Russo-Asiatic Bank
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order dated March 19, 1934, as resettled by order dated March 27, 1934, denying motion to strike from the record the appearance of attorneys purporting to represent the defendant, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (1) The Soviet decrees of nationalization and confiscation did not extinguish the life of the defendant. They were effective with respect to its assets only so far as they were contained in Russia. The juristic personality of the defendant continued perforce the acts of the refugee quorum of its directors and the acts of a majority of its stockholders in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rodkinson v. HaeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mabon v. . Ongley Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Goepel v. . Kurtz Action Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Hammond v. National Life Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Jones v. Hygienic Soap Granulator Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.