Legal Opinion

Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 18, 1963No. Nos. 16787, 16929, 16978, 16794, 16963, 17006, 17055, 17118, 17268, 17298PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge.

Petitioners, six Louisiana gas producers, appeal from an order of the Federal Power Commission (Commission) re*1002quiring them to refund amounts collected from their pipeline-purchasers1 as costs of an additional Louisiana gas gathering tax of one cent per Mcf.2 This tax, in effect from August 1 to November 30, 1958, was later held invalid by the Louisiana Supreme Court.3

In anticipation of litigation to test the validity of this tax, the Commission, on July 11, 1958, issued its Order No. 206 4 allowing the producers to file rate schedule increases reflecting the additional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. WJR, Goodwill Station, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Acker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. The Enterprise Company v. Federal Communications Commission, Beaumont Broadcasting Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, United Fuel Gas Company, Intervenor. Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenor. Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, United Fuel Gas Co., Intervenors. Union Oil Company of California v. Federal Power Commission, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, United Fuel Gas Company, Memphis Light, Gas& Water Division, City of Memphis, Tennessee Gas Transmission Co., Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Intervenors. Texaco, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, United Fuel Gas Company, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp., Intervenors. Union Texas Petroleum, a Division of Allied Chemical Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Intervenors. Phillips Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, United Fuel Gas Company, Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division, City of Memphis, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
  2. Canadian National Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1976
  3. Chicano Education & Manpower Services v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc. v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Chicano Education and Manpower Services v. United States Department of Labor, Seattle-King County Employment and Training Consortium (Hereinafter "Consortium") v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API