Legal Opinion

Wernikoff v. Vanneman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 18, 1975No. 59790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE DOWNING

delivered the opinion of the court:

Jay Wernikoff (hereinafter petitioner) brought an action seeking a writ of mandamus to compel Edgar Vanneman, Jr., the Mayor and Local Liquor Control Commissioner of the City of Evanston (hereinafter defendant), to issue to petitioner a class D liquor license. The trial court granted petitioner’s motion for summary judgment and ordered a writ of mandamus directing the issuance of the liquor license to the petitioner. Defendant now prosecutes this appeal from that order.

The following chronology of events provides the factual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  2. S. Bloom, Inc. v. KorshakIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Maywood Park Trotting Ass'n v. Illinois Harness Racing CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People Ex Rel. Cairo Turf Club, Inc. v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Malito v. MarcinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Latin Social Club, Inc. v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Jacobsen v. Illinois Liquor Control CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. American Shuffleboard & Music Corp. v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API