Legal Opinion

Monroe v. Chuck & Del's, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1993No. 19633PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDEVITT, Chief Justice.

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

On May 15, 1990, Daniel N. Monroe (“Monroe”), who had been employed by respondent, Chuck & Del’s, Inc. (“Chuck & Del’s”), as an air conditioning and heating system servicer and installer, filed a worker’s compensation application for hearing. Monroe alleged that on April 29, 1987, he “injured his back when installing a window air conditioner,” causing “disc herniation at L4, 5 and L5, SI.” He framed the issue as “[wjhether or not [he] is entitled to medical, PPI and permanent disability benefits.”

On June 1, 1990, the State Insurance Fund…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. Larry Donohoe LoggingIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Horton v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Horton v. Garrett Freightlines, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Johnson v. Boise Cascade CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Seese v. Ideal of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Pomerinke v. Excel Trucking Transport, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Hipwell v. Challenger Pallet & SupplyIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Davidson v. RIVERLAND EXCAVATING, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Chet Davidson v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API