General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Magee Carpet Works
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 320, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Columbia Co., May T., 1897, No. 143, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of the General Fire Extinguisher Company, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, v. The Magee Carpet Works, Owner and Reputed Owner and the Bloomsburg Carpet Works, Contractor. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before Dunham, P. J., specially presiding.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 320, Jan. T., 1900, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Columbia Co., May T., 1897, No. 143, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of the General Fire Extinguisher Company, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, v. The Magee Carpet Works, Owner and Reputed Owner and the Bloomsburg Carpet Works, Contractor. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before Dunham, P. J., specially presiding. At the trial it appeared that in 1896, James Magee was treasurer and general manager of both the Bloomsburg Carpet Works and the Magee Carpet Works, two corporations organized…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Ctteiam,
The conclusion arrived at in this case is that no sufficient cause appears for reversing the judgment. It is not clear that any error was committed by the court in its charge to the jury or in its answers to the defendant’s points. The specifications of error are therefore dismissed and the judgment is affirmed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Grant v. St. James Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Noll v. Cumberland Plateau RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Philadelphia Gas Range Co. v. Shallcross, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933