Hunte v. Blake
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MADDOX, Justice.
This appeal involves a dispute between two doctors over ownership of a medical complex in Mobile. Appellee/plaintiff Blake alleges that he owned twenty-five percent (25%) of the complex. Appellant/defendant Hunte disputes plaintiff’s claim and alleges that he (Hunte) owns all of the medical complex. The Mobile Circuit Court, sitting without a jury and hearing evidence presented ore tenus, found for plaintiff Blake. We affirm.
Appellant/defendant Hunte raises two issues on appeal: (1) the Statute of Frauds, and (2) the “voluminous records” exception to the best evidence rule. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Ideal Structures Corporation v. Levine Huntsville Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Marigold Coal, Incorporated v. ThamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- BARBER PURE MILK COMPANY v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baldwin County, Ala. v. Purcell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Charles J. Arndt, Inc. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Pate v. BILLY BOYD REALTY AND CONST.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Pate v. BILLY BOYD REALTY AND CONST.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997