Legal Opinion

Hunte v. Blake

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1985No. 84-128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This appeal involves a dispute between two doctors over ownership of a medical complex in Mobile. Appellee/plaintiff Blake alleges that he owned twenty-five percent (25%) of the complex. Appellant/defendant Hunte disputes plaintiff’s claim and alleges that he (Hunte) owns all of the medical complex. The Mobile Circuit Court, sitting without a jury and hearing evidence presented ore tenus, found for plaintiff Blake. We affirm.

Appellant/defendant Hunte raises two issues on appeal: (1) the Statute of Frauds, and (2) the “voluminous records” exception to the best evidence rule. We…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sovereign Camp, W. O .W. v. HoomesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ideal Structures Corporation v. Levine Huntsville Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  4. Marigold Coal, Incorporated v. ThamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. BARBER PURE MILK COMPANY v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldwin County, Ala. v. Purcell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Charles J. Arndt, Inc. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Pate v. BILLY BOYD REALTY AND CONST.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  4. Pate v. BILLY BOYD REALTY AND CONST.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API