Tedrow v. Cannon
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Jessica Tédrow and her counsel, Joseph Bryant, seek certiorari review of a nonfinal order compelling depositions and discovery for purposes of determining whether Ted-row filed — and ultimately voluntarily dismissed — a lawsuit against Jimmy Cannon that was not supported by the material facts or the existing law. See § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). Tedrow and Bryant contend that the information sought by Cannon is protected by the attorney-client and work-product privileges. We agree that Cannon is not entitled to information protected by such privileges but deny the petition…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Pino v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Wendy's of NE Florida, Inc. v. VandergriffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- State v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Genovese v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dade Truss Co. v. BeatyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Deel Realty, LLC, Etc. v. Daniel J. O'MalleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Kesler v. Progressive Select Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- Mills v. Vero Beach Country Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020