Legal Opinion

Tedrow v. Cannon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 19, 2016No. 2D15-3405PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Jessica Tédrow and her counsel, Joseph Bryant, seek certiorari review of a nonfinal order compelling depositions and discovery for purposes of determining whether Ted-row filed — and ultimately voluntarily dismissed — a lawsuit against Jimmy Cannon that was not supported by the material facts or the existing law. See § 57.105(1), Fla. Stat. (2012). Tedrow and Bryant contend that the information sought by Cannon is protected by the attorney-client and work-product privileges. We agree that Cannon is not entitled to information protected by such privileges but deny the petition…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Whitten v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Pino v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  3. Wendy's of NE Florida, Inc. v. VandergriffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. State v. RabinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Genovese v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dade Truss Co. v. BeatyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Deel Realty, LLC, Etc. v. Daniel J. O'MalleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  3. Kesler v. Progressive Select Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
  4. Mills v. Vero Beach Country Club, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API