Legal Opinion

Allen v. Danielson

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 5, 1887PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Bill in Equity for an acco’unt and for distribution.

1Opinion of the CourtDubeee, C. J.

The assignment under which the questions in this case are raised conveys all the property of the assignors, except such as is exempt from attachment by law, to the assignee, in trust, to sell and convert it into money and apply the proceeds to the payment, first, of certain claims entitled or allowed to be preferred, and then “ for the equal benefit of all our creditors in proportion to their respective claims.” At the time of the assignment some of the general creditors held claims which were .secured by mortgage. The first question is, whether the creditors so secured were entitled to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Amory v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  2. Findlay v. HosmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817
  3. Wurtz, Austin & McVeigh v. HartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  4. West v. Bank of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  5. Citizens' Bank v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  3. Tod v. Kentucky Union Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1893
  4. State v. MusumeciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Dexter Horton & Co. v. Schwabacher Bros. & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API