Legal Opinion

State v. Barkley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1905PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from. Sac District Court.— Hon. H. M. Powers, Judge. The defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape, and appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1. Rape: convictionforineluded offense. The accused was indicted for rape, and convicted of an assault with intent to commit rape. It is contended that under the evidence he should have been convicted of the higher offense or acquitted, and . . x ' that for this reason his conviction of the lower offense is not sustained by the evidence. But proof of his guilt of rape of necessity included that of every included offense, and he is not in a situation to complain of the leniency or mistake of the jury in his favor. Pratt v. State, 51 Ark. 167 (10 S. W. Rep. 233); State v. Archer, 54 N. H. 465;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  2. State v. CrossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1861
  3. State v. DesmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  5. State v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
  3. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  5. State v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API