Brennan v. Schweiker
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TROUTMAN, District Judge.
The applicable legal standard guiding our decision is not disputed: our duty is confined to a determination of whether the Secretary’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). Substantial evidence is evidence which a reasoning mind would accept as sufficient to support a conclusion; it consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be somewhat less than a preponderance. Dobrowolsky v. Caiifano, 606 F.2d 403 (3d Cir. 1979); Blalock v.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rachel R. Blalock v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Samuel A. Ferguson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crosby v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Andrews v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Bohr v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Boscher v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984