Legal Opinion

Brennan v. Schweiker

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 23, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-4562PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, District Judge.

The applicable legal standard guiding our decision is not disputed: our duty is confined to a determination of whether the Secretary’s decision is supported by substantial evidence, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). Substantial evidence is evidence which a reasoning mind would accept as sufficient to support a conclusion; it consists of more than a mere scintilla of evidence but may be somewhat less than a preponderance. Dobrowolsky v. Caiifano, 606 F.2d 403 (3d Cir. 1979); Blalock v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Rachel R. Blalock v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  3. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Leo R. Smith v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  5. Samuel A. Ferguson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crosby v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
  2. Andrews v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Bohr v. SchweikerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Boscher v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API