Legal Opinion
Peoples v. Sebring Capital Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 12, 2002No. 01 C 5676PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GOTTSCHALL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff Benjamin Peoples’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Defendant Sebring Capital Corporation (“Sebring”) opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, Peoples’s motion for leave to amend is granted.
Because Peoples has previously amended his complaint, he may amend “only by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). Sebring does the opposite of consent, so the question is whether this court should grant leave, which, the rules…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Shanahan v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Bethany Pharmacal Company, Incorporated v. Qvc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., and Fujisawa Usa, Inc. v. John K. KapoorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGrath v. EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
- Bailey v. First Nat. Bank of ChadronNebraska Court of Appeals · 2007
- Browne v. WaldoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Keller v. Lloyd & McDaniel PLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Thompson v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of PittsburgDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018