Leftwich v. Day
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, Lochren, J., presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution. The complaint alleges that by reason of this malicious prosecution the plaintiff had incurred an expenditure of $150 in his defence, and had been subjected to great annoyance, anguish of mind, and mortification, and then prays judgment for $10,150 damages. The jury found the following verdict: “We, the jury in the above-entitled cause, find for the plaintiff $150. Damage, one cent.”
Verdicts are to have a reasonable intendment, and to receive a reasonable construction, and are not to be avoided unless for necessity. However…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Grammer v. Wiggins-Meyer Steamship Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Moriarty v. McDevittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Cohues v. FinholtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Miles v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Jaenisch v. VigenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941