Nestle v. Fleming
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
Before pleading to a declaration, charging seduction and rape of a 14-year old girl, attorneys for defendant desired information as to the time, place, and circumstances of the alleged seduction and carnal knowledge, and to that end gave notice of taking the deposition of the girl under Court Rule No. 41 (1931). Counsel for plaintiff moved the circuit court to vacate the notice. The court denied the motion, and by this appeal plaintiff seeks our writ of mandamus directing the circuit court to vacate the notice.
Court Rule No. 41 (1931), so far as necessary to quote, provides:
“Any party to an…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Apportionment of State LegislatureMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Zoski v. GainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Apportionment of State LegislatureMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Hallett v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Vincent v. Van BlooysMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.