Legal Opinion

Shoniker v. English

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 28, Calendar No. 35,248PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In action and cross-action for injuries sustáined in a collision between automobiles, verdict was directed against plaintiff for contributory negligence, and defendants had verdict of a jury and judgment for damages.

Just outside the city limits of Grand RapidsUS-131, a superhighway, runs, north and south on Division street and crosses M-114, a State trunk line highway, properly so marked, at Beals street. Both streets are paved 40 feet wide at the intersection. The State highway department undertook the paving of US-131 for a distance south of the crossing and detoured the superhighway west…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hittle v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Churukian v. LaGestMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Bohnen v. GorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Carlin v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API