Shoniker v. English
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.
In action and cross-action for injuries sustáined in a collision between automobiles, verdict was directed against plaintiff for contributory negligence, and defendants had verdict of a jury and judgment for damages.
Just outside the city limits of Grand RapidsUS-131, a superhighway, runs, north and south on Division street and crosses M-114, a State trunk line highway, properly so marked, at Beals street. Both streets are paved 40 feet wide at the intersection. The State highway department undertook the paving of US-131 for a distance south of the crossing and detoured the superhighway west…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Hittle v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Churukian v. LaGestMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Bohnen v. GorrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Carlin v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.