Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Pfeiffer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 1927Published
1Opinion of the Court
Awards affirmed, with costs to Nathan Schweitzer Company, against Armour & Company, on the authority of Pfeiffer v. Schweitzer Company (215 App. Div. 738, 856), the court holding now as it did then that as a matter of law Armour & Company were independent contractors and that Pfeiffer was the employee of that corporation; and as to the claimant Austin E. Fish, he being a eoemployee of Pfeiffer, the same rule must be applied to him. Van Kirk, Acting P. J., Hinman, McCann and Whitmyer, JJ., concur; Davis, J., dissents on the ground that it was admitted by the Nathan Schweitzer Company that both…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Baldwin v. AbrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Baldwin v. . AbrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Amalgamated Roofing Co. v. Travelers InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Matter of Abromowitz v. . Hudson View Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.