Legal Opinion
Luis De Vera v. Vicente G. Blaz Phil Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 11, 1988No. 86-2554PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
De Vera, pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the decision of the Guam district court, appellate division, affirming the Guam superior court’s dismissal of his action against Blaz and Flores for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. De Vera contends the appellate division erred by deciding the appeal using a two-judge panel, by affirming the award of costs in favor of Flores, and by affirming the dismissal of his action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 48 U.S.C. § 1424-3(c), and we affirm.
I
De Vera’s complaint alleged that Blaz and Flores…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- The People of the Territory of Guam v. Jae Hung YangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Electrical Construction & Maintenance Company, Inc. v. Maeda Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- People of the Territory of Guam v. Jerry OjedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Peter C. Cruz v. The Honorable Paul J. Abbate, and the People of the Territory of Guam, Real Parties in Interest-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pamila Lalonde v. Allan Y. Davis and Mayumi D. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Juniel CharleswellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Unpingco v. Hong Kong Macau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Ann Q. Lynn v. Chin Heung International, Inc. And Korea Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. ManzoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.