Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2008No. 2007-1605Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2007-Ohio-6518, 877 N.E.2d 989. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted. Discretionary appeal is also accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II, and cause continues to be held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. *1511Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hyle v. PorterOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. Pierce, 88470 (7-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007