Legal Opinion

Switow v. Dustman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1915No. 22,812PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From Clark Circuit Court; Harry G. Montgomery, Judge. Action by Carl Dustman against Michael Switow. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914, Acts 1901 p. 590. )

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

— In the trial court appellee recovered judgment against appellant in the sum of $340 for breach of a contract, by the terms of which appellee was to furnish material and to do certain ornamental plastering and decorating in a building appellant was erecting in the city of Jeffersonville, Indiana.

1. Several errors are assigned on appeal but all are expressly-waived except the second, fourth and ninth. The ninth assignment of error states that the trial court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. In the brief of appellant under the head of “Propositions and Authorities” no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martin v. WiseIndiana Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. WiseIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. HuffordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API