Legal Opinion

J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Hufford

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1918No. 9,572Published

From Clinton Circuit Court; Joseph Combs, Judge. Action by tbe J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against John Hufford and another in which the defendants counterclaimed. From the judgment ren- • dered, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, J.

Appellant sued appellees to recover on certain notes executed by them and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure them.

At the outset it is contended by appellees that no question is presented by appellant’s brief, for rea-, sons, among others, that the points and authorities are not directed to any particular point or ruling of the trial court; “that there is no disclosed connection between the points stated and the specific causes for a new trial alleged.”

The controlling issues were presented by a complaint and counterclaim, with denials thereto. The court, in a trial without a jury, found…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Daniels v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. LathamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Illyes v. White River Light & Power Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. SampleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API