Legal Opinion

Gurr v. Willcutt

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 26, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 7426PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

The plaintiff Wilford M. Gurr (Gurr) appeals from the granting of motions for summary judgment in favor of all defendants in his medical malpractice suit. The plaintiff argues that the superior court was without jurisdiction to rule on a motion for summary judgment until his claim had been heard by a medical liability review panel. He also argues that granting summary judgment on the issue of informed consent was improper. We hold that the trial court had jurisdiction to render summary judgment and that granting summa-' ry judgment was proper.

FACTS

In June, 1981, Gurr, then…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Johnson v. PadillaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Morrell v. St. Luke's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alaface v. National Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Bell v. Maricopa Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  3. Gorney v. MeaneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Peacock v. Samaritan Health ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. St. George v. PlimptonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API