Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 10, 2007No. 34158-1-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

155 P.3d 188 (2007)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Gary Alan BOYD, Appellant.

No. 34158-1-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

April 10, 2007.

Jodi R. Backlund, Manek R. Mistry, Backlund & Mistry, Olympia, WA, for Appellant.

Jill Landes, Port Townsend, WA, for Respondent.

HOUGHTON, C.J.

¶ 1 A jury convicted Gary Boyd of voyeurism and attempted voyeurism for taking and attempting to take "upskirt" photographs of high school girls. On appeal, he argues that the "intimate areas" element of the voyeurism statute is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. He also argues that the trial court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Pirtle v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. QuickNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  2. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State Of Washington v. Christian Archaga-reyesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  4. State Of Washington v. Craig Alexander HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington v. James Edwin MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API