Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Swafford v. Borgess Medical Center
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 18, 2000No. 4:97-cv-00116PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McKEAGUE, District Judge.
Now before the Court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment, filed September 29 and October 13, 1999. 1 The Court held a hearing on the motion on November 29, 1999, and at that time took the matter under advisement. After having carefully considered the parties’ arguments, both as made in their briefs and at the hearing, the Court will grant defendants’ motions for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) for the reasons set forth below.
I
Plaintiff is a registered vascular technologist employed by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Ex Rel. James M. Thompson v. Columbia/hca Healthcare CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Chen-Cheng Wang, AKA C.C. Wang, an Individual and Ex Rel. The United States of America v. Fmc CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Cardiac Devices Qui Tam LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- United States v. PrabhuDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- United States v. Salina Regional Health Center, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- United States Ex Rel. Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.