Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Petersen

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided August 2, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00422Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO OWEN KARL JACKSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00422-BLW Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION v. AND ORDER REBECCA PETERSEN, Twin Falls County Treasurer, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Rebecca Petersen’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. 11) and Plaintiff Owen Karl Jackson’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Dkt. 15). The Court finds that oral argument will not substantially aid in the resolution of the pending motions. See Dist. Idaho Loc. Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1)(B). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will deny Petersen’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. William George Bonin v. Arthur Calderon, as Warden of San Quentin State Prison James Rowland, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States v. Hiram WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API