Legal Opinion
Rucker v. Price
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided February 21, 1996No. E 94-223PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judith Rogers, Judge.
The Board of Review affirmed and adopted the decision of the Appeal Tribunal disqualifying appellant, Sherman Rucker, from receiving unemployment compensation benefits based on a finding that he was discharged for misconduct connected with the work. In this unbriefed appeal, the issue before us is whether the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. We hold that it is so supported, and affirm.
Appellant was employed by Townsends of Arkansas, Inc. In October of 1990, Townsends implemented a chemical substance and alcohol abuse policy with the goal of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perdrix-Wang v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
- Feagin v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- George's Inc. v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
- Grace Drilling Co. v. Director of LaborCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1990
3Cited by26 opinions
- Garrett v. Dir.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Rossini v. Director, Arkansas Employee Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Hiner v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Clark v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Niece v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.