Legal Opinion

Niece v. Director, Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1999No. E 98-72PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from the Board of Review’s decision finding that appellant intentionally violated the employer’s drug policy and that such action was misconduct for the purposes of unemployment law. On appeal, appellant argues that there is no substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision and that the employer failed to promptly provide medical treatment in accordance with the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Act. We agree with appellant’s first point and reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

The record reveals that appellant was employed by Dillard’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Perdrix-Wang v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Rucker v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. George's Inc. v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Anderson v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Dray v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Dir.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Rossini v. Director, Arkansas Employee Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Maxfield v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Gunter v. Director, Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Fleming v. DIRECTOR. ARK. EMP. SEC. DEPT.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API