Legal Opinion

Bryan v. Kershaw

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1966No. 23017PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas enjoining appellants, Bryan and Hambrick, from duplicating or using- to commercial advantage until September 21, 1966 a “railroad track undercutter of the type having a self-loading feature” which they had built. Appellee Kershaw Manufacturing Company, hereafter referred to as Kershaw, attacks by cross-appeal the limited duration of the injunction.

Kershaw is a manufacturer of railroad maintenance equipment. Prior to this action, it had developed a “railroad track…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. West Peachtree Tenth Corporation D/B/A One Tenth Street ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Har-Pen Truck Lines, Inc. v. Frederick Allen Mills, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Justiss Oil Co. v. Kerr-McGee Refining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. St. Louis Typographical Union No. 8, Afl-Cio v. Herald Company, D/B/A Globe-Democrat Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API