Legal Opinion

In Re Peak

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 2000No. 96-SP-439PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Francine Lynch, designated in the trial court and in the caption of this case as Francine Peak, (herein Lynch) appeals following a conditional plea of guilty to criminal contempt for violation of the terms of one provision of a release order by failing to refrain from illegal drug use. The plea was in response to a thirteen-count show cause order which alleged four violations of a permanent injunction and nine violations of the release order that was entered as part of a prior contempt proceeding for violation of the injunction. Her principal argument on appeal is that she cannot…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Timothy W. MarklingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Barbara Eunice Carrasco, United States of America v. Barbara Eunice Carrasco and German Rivera-JiminezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. James Clayton BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. IN RE Q.B. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Beachum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Thomas Van Lent v. the Everglades Foundation, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API