Legal Opinion
Chesterfield Development, Corp. v. City of Chesterfield
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 13, 1991No. 89-1554-C-7PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Chesterfield’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This Court may grant a motion for summary judgment if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552, 91…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Andon, LLC v. City of Newport NewsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2014