Legal Opinion

State ex rel. White v. U.S. Gypsum Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1990No. 88-1952PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Alice Robie Resnick,

J. For this court to issue a writ of mandamus, the relator must demonstrate that he has a clear legal right to the relief sought, and that the Industrial Commission has a clear legal duty to provide such relief. See State, ex rel. Rouch, v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co. (1986), 26 Ohio St. 3d 197, 198, 26 OBR 289, 290, 498 N.E. 2d 464, 466; State, ex rel. Elliott, v. Indus. Comm. (1986), 26 Ohio St. 3d 76, 26 OBR 66, 497 N.E. 2d 70; State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, 40 O.O. 2d 141, 228 N.E. 2d 631. In order to establish that a clear legal…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Welker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State ex rel. Welker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API