Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Martin

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2000No. NonePublished

1DissentSabers, Justice

[¶ 13.] A plurality of this Court has determined that a person driving with a revoked, suspended or expired license is súb-*735ject to arrest, search, interrogation, and having the contents of their vehicle inventoried. See State v. Vocu, 2000 SD 109, ¶ 11, 615 N.W.2d 623; State v. Brassfield, 2000 SD 110, ¶ 16, 615 N.W.2d 628. This intrusion is unwarranted and flies in the face of statutory authority. See Vocu, 2000 SD 109, ¶¶ 16-21, 615 N.W.2d at 626-28 (Amundson, J., dissenting); Brassfield, 2000 SD 110, ¶¶ 22-27, 615 N.W.2d at 632-34 (Sabers, J., dissenting).

[¶ 14.] SDCL 32-12-65 provides…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BrassfieldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. VocuSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API