Legal Opinion

Caramini v. Tegulias

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 10, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The plaintiffs are the parents of the defendant Mary Tegulias, who is the wife of the other defendant, Stephen Tegulias. On July 25th, 1921, the plaintiffs deeded to the defendants the property described in the complaint, reserving to themselves the use, income and profits of the same during their natural lives. The only consideration for the deed, and the inducement to the plaintiffs to execute it, was the promise of the defendants that they would support and care for the plaintiffs as long as the latter should live. The parties all lived together in the second floor apartment of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peck v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1872
  2. Penfield v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1874

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Annette Heyman, Individually v. Robert S. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Maytag Company v. AlwardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Bernstein v. NemeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  4. Federal Land Bank v. KoslofskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Maruca v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API