Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Bank of Arlington

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 11, 1932No. 21664PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, B. J.

1. The case coming to this court upon the sustaining of a demurrer, the allegations of the stricken answer will be taken and accepted precisely as made, irrespective of any issue of fact which might arise on the trial. The defendant pleaded that he signed the indorse*687ment, acting and relying upon the statement made by the president of the bank to the effect that the indorsement was a mere formality, without risk to the defendant, for the reason that the bank held from the principal on the note a lien on property affording ample security for the payment of the debt, and that this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hart v. WaldoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Miller v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Summerour v. PappaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Wood v. Cincinnati Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Fenley v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elliott v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. F. N. Roberts Pest Control Co. v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  3. Norris v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
  4. Mosely v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  5. Love v. NixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API