Legal Opinion

Castello v. Arbogast

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 2025No. 4:24-cv-01032Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY MICHAEL CASTELLO, : CIVIL NO. 4:24-CV-1032 : Plaintiff, : : v. : : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) TYLER ARBOGAST, et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction We last addressed this pro se prisoner lawsuit on consideration of a motion to dismiss, which we granted, dismissing all of the claims and defendants in the plaintiff’s complaint except the Fourth Amendment excessive force claim brought against law enforcement defendants Troopers Arbogast, Horan, and Bowers in their individual capacities. (Doc. 34). Apparently emboldened by the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API