People's Bank of Rock Hill v. People's Bank of Anderson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
January 18, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by For the reasons therein stated the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE WATTS concurs.
MR. JUSTICE MARION concurs in result.
MR. JUSTICE FRASER: I dissent.
I cannot see how this act can be constitutional. Eight counties are exempt from its operation. "Provided that this act shall not apply to the counties of Sumter," etc. The named counties are entirely exempt from its operation. It cannot be successfully held that we may strike out the unconstitutional proviso and leave the act there, so that the act applies…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Chesson v. Kieckhefer Container Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Xepapas v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
- Stone v. TraynhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Ridgill v. Clarendon CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.