Farrington v. Maine State Highway Commission
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtMarden, J.
On appeal from judgment and from the denial of a motion by the State for a new trial on the usual grounds addressed to the Presiding Justice. This is a complaint for damages occasioned by the taking of land from plaintiffs for highway purposes and involves the usual elements of the actual taking of a certain area (.78 approximately acre), the rendering of a second portion inacces sible (.10 approximately acre) and the imposition on the plaintiffs’ remaining land of two drainage easements.
The jury was given the benefit of testimony of the owners, an appraiser (whose qualifications were…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SlorahSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
- Bangor & Piscataquis Railroad v. McCombSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1872
- Reed v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- Shepherd v. Inhabitants of CamdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1890
- Peabody v. HewettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1861
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Simmons v. State Ex Rel. State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- Timberlands, Inc. v. Maine State Highway CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
- Luce v. Maine Fidelity Life InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974