Legal Opinion

Kingsport Utilities, Inc. v. Steadman

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided March 16, 1956No. 1043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This is an action to acquire by condemnation a tract of land in fee simple for use as a transformer station location and containing 3.302 acres; also, rights-of-way for electric line easements over adjacent lands on each side of the substation tract.

The landowners, defendants herein, have questioned the legality of the attempted taking on the ground that the substation site and rights-of-way have not been located where they will do the least damage.

Further obstacles are raised in that defendants leave in a state of suspension what they intend to do about…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. United States ex rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. DuggerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1948
  3. Webb v. Knox County Transmission Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. 113.81 Acres of LandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959
  2. City of Memphis, A Municipal Corporation for the Use and Benefit of Memphis Light Gas and Water v. Tandy J. Gilliland Family, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2012
  3. Bonnie Steadman and Maxie Steadman v. Kingsport Utilities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API