Legal Opinion
United States v. 113.81 Acres of Land
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 16, 1959No. 7800PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLIVER J. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff in this condemnation action has moved to strike an amendment to the answer of defendant, Claire E. Rose, under the provisions of Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A., upon the grounds that the amend*369ment is impertinent, immaterial and insufficient in law.
The substance of the attacked amendment 1 is that the condemning agency and
its agents acted in bad faith, and abused its and their discretion in taking the subject property, both as to the amount of, and the nature of the estate in, the property taken. Defendant does not…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. CarmackSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Sweet v. RechelSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. 416.81 Acres of Land, Etc., and Mercantile National Bank of Indiana, as TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United Artists Associated, Inc. v. NWL CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Allain-Lebreton Company v. Department of the Army, New Orleans District, Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Amen Wardy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. 45,149.58 Acres of Land, more or less, situated in Dare CountyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.